A STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR EQUATING RIGHTS SCORES TO FORMULA SCORES
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Impact of Correction for Guessing Formula on MC and Yes/No Vocabulary Tests' Scores
A standard correction for random guessing (cfg) formula on multiple-choice and Yes/Noexaminations was examined retrospectively in the scores of the intermediate female EFL learners in an English language school. The correctionwas a weighting formula for points awarded for correct answers,incorrect answers, and unanswered questions so that the expectedvalue of the increase in test score due to g...
متن کامل[Equating scores using bridging stations on the clinical performance examination].
PURPOSE This study examined the use of the Tucker linear equating method in producing an individual student's score in 3 groups with bridging stations over 3 consecutive days of the clinical performance examination (CPX) and compared the differences in scoring patterns by bridging number. METHODS Data were drawn from 88 examinees from 3 different CPX groups-DAY1, DAY2, and DAY3-each of which ...
متن کاملFive factor model prototype matching scores: convergence within alternative methods.
The Five Factor Model of Personality (FFM) has been proposed as a potential alternative to the current DSM-IV-TR model, which conceptualizes personality disorders (PDs) as categorical constructs. While an extensive literature has pointed out the flaws of the diagnostic categories, they are quite familiar to clinicians and there may still be instances when identifying these constructs for clinic...
متن کاملA formula for the correlation between random-set enrichment scores
Given constants s1, s2, . . . , sG, we consider variables X = ∑ sg1[g ∈ A] and Y = ∑ sg1[g ∈ B] as random variables with a joint distribution determined by taking (A,B) as uniformly random among set pairs in which A has fixed cardinality m, B has fixed cardinality n, and the intersection A ∩ B has fixed size q. Arguments about without-replacement sampling give the marginal mean and variance of ...
متن کاملUsing Propensity Scores to Adjust for Group Differences: Examples Comparing Alternative Surgical Methods
Comparing the effectiveness of two treatments on nonrandomized groups is difficult because there are almost always baseline differences between the groups. Propensity scores (Rosenbaum and Rubin, Biometrika 1983) are a valuable but underutilized approach for adjusting for group differences. When two groups are being compared, the propensity score can be calculated as the predicted probability o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: ETS Research Report Series
سال: 1981
ISSN: 2330-8516
DOI: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.1981.tb01241.x